Skip to content

caver456

My feedback

14 results found

  1. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    caver456 shared this idea  · 
  2. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    caver456 shared this idea  · 
  3. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    caver456 shared this idea  · 
  4. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    caver456 shared this idea  · 
  5. 16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    caver456 commented  · 

    our area spans elevation from a few hundred feet MSL to 9000' - google imagery was taken during the winter - bing and ESRI World Imagery were taken apparently in the late spring - a lot more useful! Both have 0.3m resolution which is the real win vs what's in there now - just pointing out that google doesn't win for everywhere.

  6. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    caver456 commented  · 

    ctrl-I = Information

    caver456 shared this idea  · 
  7. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    caver456 supported this idea  · 
    caver456 shared this idea  · 
  8. 15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    caver456 supported this idea  · 
  9. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    caver456 supported this idea  · 
    caver456 shared this idea  · 
  10. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    caver456 supported this idea  · 
    caver456 shared this idea  · 
  11. 51 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    caver456 supported this idea  · 
  12. 51 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    caver456 supported this idea  · 
  13. 17 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    caver456 commented  · 

    our SAR group (CA) has looked at doing actual field tests to see where certain signals can be received. Simple radius, even automatically accounting for topography / line of sight, might or might not produce actual usable results due to local interference - power lines, multipath off buildings, tree cover, other structures, etc etc. If the field testing yields usable info, then a raster overlay might be a good way to handle it: draw your actual reception area by hand and add it as a raster overlay.

  14. 72 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    caver456 commented  · 

    Please clarify? Is this a request to be able to edit multiple sublayers/data objects at once, i.e. make these 5 tracks green or make these 3 markers use this certain symbol?

Feedback and Knowledge Base